Comcare - Australian Goverment
Comcare - Australian Goverment
Putting you first at the centre of what we do. Keeping you healthy and safe at work. Supporting you when you are harmed at work. Ensuring your scheme works and is sustainable.
Listen to this page using ReadSpeaker

Report of operations 4

Workplace diversity

In comparison with the APS-wide profile of diversity groups, Comcare continued to have proportionately more female employees, significantly more people from NESB1 groups4 and a similar proportion of people identifying with a disability. The proportion of Indigenous employees remains less than the APS-wide profile. Identification as an Indigenous Australian, a person with a disability and NESB is voluntary and therefore the data only reflects those employees who elect to identify.

Table 7: Percentage of employees represented in diversity groups

Diversity group

Comcare

(30 June 2004)

APS

(30 June 2003)

Women

61.6

52.8

Indigenous Australians

0.3

2.4

People with a disability

3.7

3.6

NESB 1

6.2

3.3

At 30 June 2004 the median age for females was 39.5 and 43.5 for males, similar to the APS median age of 41 years 5.

Flexible working arrangements

Comcare’s Certified Agreement provides for a range of flexible working arrangements and conditions to support employees in achieving work-life balance. These provisions are well-utilised by staff, with an increasing proportion (12.5% at 30 June 2004) working part-time, and 11 staff members utilising purchased leave (48/52) arrangements.

Maternity leave

During 2003 – 04 8 staff took maternity leave.

Workplace harassment policy and contact officers

Comcare’s workplace harassment policy and guidelines are being updated. During March 2004 IPS, the Employee Assistance Provider (EAP), facilitated for all employees a number of general awareness training sessions on bullying and harassment. There was a high level of participation and interest shown in the topic. It is intended to offer these sessions regularly in 2004 – 05.

The number of internal Harassment Contact Officers was significantly expanded and appropriate in-house training was provided, including refresher training for those whose initial training was some years ago.

Consultation on the proposed scope and content of a new workplace diversity plan commenced with the Comcare National Consultative Committee. Following further consultation it is expected that the new plan will be finalised early in 2004 – 05.

Performance against outputs

Comcare’s outcome and outputs framework

The 2003 – 04 Portfolio Budget Statement defines Comcare’s outcome as

Minimise human and financial costs of workplace injury in the Commonwealth jurisdiction.

Comcare achieves this by

  • improving the safety and rehabilitation of employees in the Commonwealth jurisdiction and the compensation services we provide
  • engaging our stakeholders and customers in achieving that improvement
  • supporting our people to enable them to best contribute to improving our business.

    The key priorities for Comcare in 2003 – 04 were

  • ensuring the continued financial viability of the premium scheme
  • ensuring active and effective management of claims, including in relation to any movement in claims costs due to changing claim profiles
  • continuing to improve health and safety in the jurisdiction by encouraging appropriate prevention and return to work activities.

    Diagram 3 shows the relationship between the outcome and the contributing outputs for Comcare.

Diagram 3: Relationship between outcome and contributing outputs

Resources for outcome Table 8 shows the total resourcing for the outcome, including

  • total administered revenue
  • revenue from Government (appropriation) for outputs
  • revenue from other sources
  • total price of outputs less administered revenue. 6 From 1 July 2004 the SRC Act covers members of the ADF only in respect of injuries or diseases relatedto ADF service prior to that date.

Outcome 1: Minimise human and financial costs of workplace injury in the Commonwealth jurisdiction.

(1)

(2)

(2) – (1)

Budget#1

2003–04

$’000

Actual

2003–04

$’000

Variation

2003–04

$’000

Budget

2004-05

$’000

Administered appropriations

To Special Account for Seafarers’ Rehabilitation and Compensation

290

109

(181)

260

Total administered appropriations

290

109

(181)

260

Departmental appropriations

Output Group 1.1 – SRC Act Regulation

0

0

0

0

Output Group 1.2 – OHS Act Regulation

100

46

(54)

100

Output Group 1.3 – Management of premium claims

7,370

0

(7,370)

#2

0

Output Group 1.4 – Management of pre-premium claims

72,430

72,590

160

72,022

Output Group 1.5 – Administration for the Seacare Authority

400

400

0

410

Subtotal output group

80,300

73,036

(7,264)

72,532

Total revenue from government (appropriations) contributing to price of departmental outputs

80,300

73,036

(7,264)

72,532

Revenue from other sources

Output Group 1.1 – SRC Act Regulation

3,390

3,601

211

3,664

Output Group 1.2 – OHS Act Regulation

6,260

6,216

(44)

6,351

Output Group 1.3 – Management of premium claims

139,950

155,502

15,552

#2

181,304

Output Group 1.4 – Management of pre-premium claims

0

0

0

0

Output Group 1.5 – Administration for the Seacare Authority

0

0

0

0

Total revenue from other sources

149,600

165,319

(15,719)

191,319

Total price from departmental outputs

229,900

238,355

8,455

263,851

Total estimated resourcing for outcome 1 (Total price of outputs and admin expenses)

229,610

238,246

8,636

263,591

2003–04

2003–04

2003–04

2004–05

Average staffing level (number)

312

332

20

333

Notes on significant variations: #1 Budget figures are taken from the 2003 – 04 Portfolio Budget Statements (Budget Related Paper 1.6) for the Employment and Workplace Relations portfolio. #2 No appropriation funding for the management of premium claims was required due to an increase in the amountof premiums payable direct to Comcare.