Putting you first at the centre of what we do. Keeping you healthy and safe at work. Supporting you when you are harmed at work. Ensuring your scheme works and is sustainable.
Substantive
These cases set out the final orders of the Federal Court or Fair Work Australia on whether duty-holders have complied with Federal Work Health and Safety law, or whether appeals against decisions of Comcare or its investigators are successful.
- Comcare v Transpacific Industries Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 90 (Open Manhole – Fatality)
- Comcare v John Holland Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 449 (2 May 2012)
- Comcare v The Commonwealth of Australia [2010] FCA 1331 (Malu Sara)
- Comcare v Gritsch [2010] FCA 1220 (Employee in breach of duty under Federal work health and safety law)
- CEPU v Comcare [2010] FWA 2685 (Appeal against decision of COmcare investigator to issue Improvement Notice)
- Comcare v Linfox Australia Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 793 (Forklift incident- severe crush injuries)
- Comcare v John Holland Pty Ltd (No 2) [2009] FCA 1515 (Dalrymple Bay Jinker fatality)
- Telstra Corporation Ltd v Smith [2009] FCAFC 103 (Decision on appeal - Procedural aspects of investigations and requirements of reports of investigation)
- Comcare v John Holland Rail Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 771 (Friction Saw Burns)
- Comcare v Commonwealth of Australia [2009] FCA 70 (Cadet Francis)
- Comcare v Post Logistics Australasia Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 1987 (Forklift incident - fatality of contractor)
- Telstra Corporation Ltd v Smith [2008] FCA 1859 (Decision at 1st instance - Procedural aspects of investigations and requirements of reports of investigation)
- Comcare v National Gallery of Australia [2007] (FCA 1548)
- Telstra Corporation Ltd v Comcare Australia Pty Ltd [2007] AIRC 136 (Burwood Telephone Exchange - Appeal against Improvement Notice)
- Comcare v Commonwealth of Australia [2007] FCA 662 (Trooper Lawrence)