- Promoting health and safety
Creating mentally healthy workplaces
- Why is work health important?
- Healthy worker
- Working together: Promoting mental health and wellbeing at work
- Mental Health and Wellbeing - Participating and thriving in our workplaces
- Supporting ability at work
- Supporting health, performance and productivity
- Flexible work
- Building a resilient workforce
- Health Benefits of Work Programme
- Roles and responsibilities
- Duty Holders
- Comcare research program
- Health and safety representatives
- Investing in Experience: Age diversity in the workplace
- Work Health and Safety campaign program
- Education & training
- Creating mentally healthy workplaces
- Preventing harm
- Managing risks in the workplace
- Managing hazards
- Early intervention
- Recovery and return to work
- Recovery and rehabilitation
- Returning to work
- Returning to independence
- Claims and benefits
- Roles and responsibilities - claims
- Can I claim?
- Lodging a claim
- Assessing a claim
- Medical treatment
- Benefits and entitlements
- Frequently asked questions
- Reconsiderations and reviews
- Active Management Model
- Customer Information System (CIS)
- Our fraud policy
- Case managers
- Medical practitioners
- Forms and publications
- The scheme
- Overview of the Comcare scheme
- The WHS Act
- The SRC Act
- The ARC Act
- Authorities we work with
- Employers in the Comcare scheme
- Work health and safety regulatory framework
- Work health and safety compliance and enforcement
- WHS enforcement
- Regulator Performance Framework
- Cost recovery
- About us
- Organisational structure
- Comcare 2015–16 Corporate Plan
- Useful links
- Contact us
- Access to information
- Public Interest Disclosures
- Comcare diversity programme
- News & media
2016 National WHS Forums
- Comcare National Conference
- Comcare Work Health and Safety Awards
- Rehabilitation Case Manager Forums
- 2015 Managing psychological injuries in the Comcare scheme
- 2015 Health and Safety Representative Forums
- 2014 Health and Safety Representative Forums
- 2014 National Conference
- 2013 National Conference
- 2014 Preventing psychological injury in changing workplaces forum
- 2013 Rehabilitation Case Manager Forum - May
- 2012 Comcare Asbestos Forum
- 2012 Rehabilitation Case Manager Forums - November
- 2012 National Conference
- 2012 Comcare Work Health and Safety Awards
- 2012 Rehabilitation Case Manager Forums - May
- 2011 National Conference
- Health and Safety Representative Forums Cairns/Townsville
- 2016 National WHS Forums
- How to apply
- Temporary employment register
- Graduate Program
- Indigenous Graduate Program
- What we offer
- Working at Comcare
Transpacific Industries fined following chemical incident
Media release- 23 Dec 2014
Comcare welcomes the Federal Court in Adelaide's decision to fine Transpacific Industries following an incident involving an employee being exposed to hazardous chemicals.
Transpacific Industries has today been fined $110,000 for failing to provide a safe work environment.
In December 2011, a Transpacific Industries employee was working at a chemical recycling plant in Wingfield, South Australia.
While the man was pouring 25 kilogram bags of sodium sulphide into a tank, he was overcome with inhaling fumes and suffered severe dizziness and breathing difficulties, before collapsing.
The Court found that the work being undertaken by the employee was unsafe because there were not appropriate systems of work and inadequate information, training and/or instruction to enable the employee to safely perform the work.
The Federal Court found that Transpacific Industries breached section 16 of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 1991 (Cth) in respect to the incident. The Court found Transpacific Industries failed to take all reasonably practicable steps to:
- Provide and maintain a safe working environment for its employees.
- Ensure that the safety of its employees was not compromised in the connection with the handling and storage of hazardous substances.
- Ensure that its employees were provided with adequate information, training, instruction and supervision to carry out work safely and without risk to their health.
The Court found that while safety equipment was available at the workplace, employees were not required to use it.
In his judgement, Justice Mansfield said "it was inappropriate to leave decisions about personal protective equipment to employees doing the work, without adequate training on the [dangerous] substance they were working with or the risk of harm that arose from that substance."
Comcare's Regulatory Operations Group Acting General Manager, Paul Orwin, said this case highlighted the importance for companies with high-risk operations to ensure there were appropriate health and safety systems in place.
"There is a serious risk of injury or death when dealing with chemicals of this nature," Mr Orwin said.
"Employers need to undertake the appropriate risk assessments to ensure employees carrying out these duties understand the requirements and are safe," Mr Orwin said.
Media Manager, Comcare
0478 305 675