- Promoting health and safety
- Creating mentally healthy workplaces
- Why is work health important?
- Healthy worker
- Working together: Promoting mental health and wellbeing at work
- Mental Health and Wellbeing - Participating and thriving in our workplaces
- Supporting ability at work
- Supporting health, performance and productivity
- Flexible work
- Building a resilient workforce
- Health Benefits of Work
- Roles and responsibilities
- Duty Holders
- Comcare research program
- Health and safety representatives
- Investing in Experience: Age diversity in the workplace
- Education & training
- Creating mentally healthy workplaces
- Preventing harm
- Managing risks in the workplace
- Managing hazards
- Early intervention
- Recovery and return to work
- Recovery and rehabilitation
- Returning to work
- Returning to independence
- Claims and benefits
- Roles and responsibilities - claims
- Can I claim?
- Lodging a claim
- Assessing a claim
- Medical treatment
- Benefits and entitlements
- Frequently asked questions
- Dispute Resolution Service
- Customer Information System (CIS)
- Our service charter
- Our fraud policy
- Case managers
- Forms & publications
- The scheme
- The SRC Act
- Information on 2011 SRC Act amendments
- Information on 2009 SRC Act amendments
- Information on the 2007 SRCOLA Amendments
- SRC Regulations Amendments 1988 to 1999
- SRC Regulations Amendments 2000 to 2009
- SRC Regulations Amendments from 2010
- Overview of the Comcare scheme
- The Parliamentary Injury Compensation Scheme
- The WHS Act
- The ARC Act
- Authorities we work with
- Premium paying employers
- Our compliance and enforcement activities
- Scheme guidance
- Regulatory guides
- Regulator Performance Framework
- Cost recovery
- The SRC Act
- About us
- Organisational structure
- Comcare 2017-18 Corporate Plan
- Useful links
- Contact us
- Access to information
- Service charter
- Public Interest Disclosures
- Comcare diversity programme
- News & media
- Comcare and Defence Science and Technology Research and Development Community of Practice Forum
- SA/NT WHS Networking and Information Forums
- NSW WHS Networking and Information Forums
- Comcare National Conference
- Comcare Work Health and Safety Awards
- Past events
- 2017 National WHS Forums
- Learn how to manage workplace psychological injuries
- Managing Workplace Psychological and Stress Injuries
- 2016 National Conference
- 2016 National WHS Forums
- 2016 Comcare Rehabilitation Case Manager Forum - May
- 2016 Chronic Pain: New Understanding, New Paradigm, New Approach
- 2015 Comcare Rehabilitation Case Manager Forum - May
- 2015 Managing psychological injuries in the Comcare scheme
- 2015 Health and Safety Representative Forums
- 2014 Health and Safety Representative Forums
- 2014 National Conference
- 2014 Comcare Work Health and Safety Awards
- 2013 National Conference
- 2014 Preventing psychological injury in changing workplaces forum
- 2013 Rehabilitation Case Manager Forum - May
- 2012 Comcare Asbestos Forum
- 2012 Rehabilitation Case Manager Forums - November
- 2012 National Conference
- 2012 Comcare Work Health and Safety Awards
- 2012 Rehabilitation Case Manager Forums - May
- 2011 National Conference
- Health and Safety Representative Forums Cairns/Townsville
- Current vacancies
- Stepping Into Program
- Graduate Program
- Indigenous Graduate Program
- How to apply
- What we offer
- Working at Comcare
Inspectors' powers relating to evidence of offences
The WHS Act gives specific powers to an inspector where the inspector has a certain state of belief that an offence against the Commonwealth Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (WHS Act) or the Commonwealth Work Health and Safety Regulations 2011 (WHS Regulations) has been committed or that something constitutes evidence of an offence.
An inspector can exercise any other applicable powers when exercising powers related to evidence of offences. There is nothing to prevent information obtained under other powers being used as evidence in a prosecution for an offence.
1. Power to seize evidence
An inspector who enters a workplace may form the view that a thing (including a document) at the workplace is evidence of an offence against the WHS Act or WHS Regulations.
Under section 175 of the WHS Act, if the inspector reasonably believes that the thing is evidence of an offence, the inspector may seize the thing.
The ‘reasonably believes’ threshold indicates that there must exist facts which are sufficient to induce a belief in a reasonable person.
The provisions described in ‘Inspectors’ power to seize dangerous workplaces and things’ under the headings ‘Location of seized things’ and ‘After seizure’ also apply to things that are seized under section 175.
2. Power to require name and address
Under section 185 of the WHS Act, an inspector may require a person to provide the person’s name and residential address if:
- the inspector finds the person committing an offence against the WHS Act or WHS Regulations
- the inspector finds the person in circumstances that lead, or has information that leads, the inspector to reasonably suspect the person has committed an offence against the WHS Act or WHS Regulations.
This power is not dependant on the inspector having entered a workplace.
In making this requirement, the inspector must:
- tell the person the reason for the requirement to provide his or her name and residential address
- warn the person that it is an offence to fail to state that name and residential address, unless the person has a reasonable excuse.
The person must not, without reasonable excuse, refuse or fail to comply with the inspector’s requirement. To do so is an offence.
If the person provides a name or residential address that the inspector reasonably believes is false, the inspector may require the person to give evidence of the correctness of the name or address. Typically, the evidence might be a form of identification such as a drivers licence. It is an offence for the person to refuse or fail to give the evidence as required by the inspector, unless the person has a reasonable excuse.
If the person was at a workplace which the inspector had entered, the inspector could require the person to produce documents or answer questions. The narrower power in section 185, which does not depend on whether an inspector is at a workplace, is likely to have limited applicability.
 WHS Act, section 175(1).
 George v Rocket  HCA 26; (1990) 170 CLR 104 at 112–113.
 WHS Act, section 185(1).
 WHS Act, section 185(2).
 WHS Act, section 185(4). The penalty is $10,000. The evidential burden is on the accused to show a reasonable excuse.
 WHS Act, section 185(3).
 WHS Act, section 185(4).